As we get closer to the new year, the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) landscape seems to be going through what many people call an unprecedented change. The term ESG stands for a comprehensive framework that encompasses environmental stewardship, social responsibility, and corporate governance, and the shift underway touches every one of these dimensions. However, one might reasonably ask if such broad descriptions really show how complicated this change is. ESG-aligned assets, including sustainable funds and mutual funds with governance criteria, are expected to reach $167.49 trillion by 2030, which is almost half of all professionally managed investments. However, these numbers are based on assumptions that may not take into account how the market might change or how politics might change.
The data points to what some might call a critical leadership competency crisis, even though they may be revealing. Only 2% of boards have what current metrics say is enough climate governance expertise, which shows that there are big gaps among board members and senior executives tasked with overseeing ESG considerations. Adding to these worries, 60% of companies are said to not have important Scope 3 emissions data, including indirect greenhouse gas emissions and carbon emissions from across their value chains. This number is scary, but it may be too simple to explain the methodological problems that come with these kinds of measurements. ESG rating agencies have also noted these data quality concerns in their assessments and ESG scores. The demand for green-skilled professionals is growing at 11.6% per year, which is twice as fast as the supply growth rate of 5.6%. However, whether this difference “threatens to derail” corporate sustainability transitions, as some people say, or is just a big but manageable problem, needs more thought.
This report tries to help organizations deal with the ESG transition by naming three important leadership competency pillars: “Climate Transition & Risk Governance, Sustainable Supply-Chain & Procurement Mastery, and ESG Data, Digital & Assurance Fluency.” Companies that actively work on these leadership competencies through dedicated leadership development programs may be more likely to get a competitive edge in getting capital, following the rules, attracting talent, and building trust with stakeholders, but the relationships between these ESG factors are probably more complicated than simple models would suggest.
It is amazing that ESG investing assets reached $35.48 trillion in 2025, driven by asset managers and ESG investors who increasingly use ESG criteria in their investment decision making process. However, whether the predictions that they will grow to $167.49 trillion by 2034 at an 18.82% CAGR will come true depends on some assumptions that may need to be looked at more closely. This change, which some say is the biggest change in the capital market in modern history, shows how investors are increasingly using sustainability criteria and ESG principles to guide responsible investing and shape their investment choices.
Private climate investment alone reached $1.77 trillion in 2023, which is a lot. These numbers show that there is momentum, but it is not clear if this growth rate can keep going in the face of economic problems. Critics argue that some of this growth may reflect rebranding of existing strategies rather than fundamentally new approaches to environmental responsibility.
The ISSB’s IFRS S1 and S2 standards, along with climate related financial disclosures from the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, have been adopted by a lot of people around the world, which some people call “remarkable.” This is said to be the fastest adoption of any international accounting standard, though such comparisons may be too simple given the difficulties of implementation. It seems important that 13 jurisdictions started implementation by December 2024, but it is not clear if 22 more will follow. These evolving ESG standards aim to promote transparency and encourage companies to disclose sustainability related risks in their annual reports.
The EU’s CSRD will require 50,000+ companies, including many public companies, to disclose double-materiality starting in 2025. This is a big job that may be hard for smaller companies to do, given the ESG reporting requirements involved. The Global Reporting Initiative continues to provide foundational guidance for organizations navigating these frameworks. The SEC’s rules on Scope 1 and 2 emissions help the US meet its own goals around ESG disclosures. California’s SB 253 and SB 261, on the other hand, expand those goals to include more than 10,000 businesses. Critics say that this patchwork method makes things more confusing than clear, though, and that the lack of unified governance principles across jurisdictions remains a key challenge.
Human capital is one of the biggest obstacles to a successful ESG transition. A report from 2024 on “Global Green Skills” shows that the talent gap is getting bigger: demand for green skills rose by 11.6%, but supply only rose by 5.6%. By 2030, one out of every five jobs will not have enough qualified green workers. By 2050, this will grow to one out of every two jobs. Addressing these sustainability issues through targeted leadership development is essential for closing the gap.
An analysis of the industry shows that there is a serious lack of skills in important key areas:
Core Definition: The way a business plans to deal with climate change and its environmental issues. It has a plan for how to move to a low-carbon economy, including the adoption of renewable energy sources, and the oversight needed to deal with the sustainability related risks and negative externalities that come with it.
Important Skills Needed:
How to Put It into Action:
A formal evaluation of a board’s current climate knowledge against the skills needed for strong climate governance should be the first step on the road to strong climate governance. Board members should be assessed against these key components of climate literacy. With that base in place, a dedicated development program can be put in place to help current directors improve their climate governance skills through ongoing leadership development. To support this internal growth, strategic hiring should focus on bringing in new directors who have a lot of experience in climate finance, the energy transition, or environmental science.
To make sure that this knowledge leads to action, climate issues are then built into the organization’s enterprise risk management framework, strengthening the company’s risk profile. Finally, executive compensation is directly linked to the achievement of key climate transition milestones in order to drive financial performance and keep leaders focused.
Core Definition: Sustainable Supply-Chain & Procurement Mastery is the plan that a business uses to make sure that all of its suppliers and all of its purchases are good for the environment. This means being responsible to society and making money. It shows that you can not only manage but also improve the supply chain’s ethical and environmental performance at a high level, reflecting company values around social justice and environmental responsibility.
Important Skills Needed:
How to Put It into Action:
Building capabilities in a logical order is how to become an expert in a sustainable supply chain. The first step in the process is supply chain mapping, which shows the whole value chain and finds suppliers down to the third tier. This new level of visibility makes it possible to do a full ESG risk assessment on all supplier relationships, taking a holistic view of the company’s relationships with its partners.
After that, the use of digital platforms gives you the infrastructure you need to collect ESG data in a strong and scalable way. This information is then used to create proactive stakeholder engagement programs and development projects that aim to improve supplier ESG performance while safeguarding natural resources. Finally, the strategy grows by fully integrating supplier ESG metrics into the process of making decisions about buying and sourcing, reflecting sound business practices across the organization.
Core Definition: This means that an organization can easily manage its Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) information from the time it is collected until it is reported. It means that you are very good at using digital tools, including ESG analytics platforms, to make sure that all stakeholders, such as investors, regulators, and the board, can trust the data. Governance refers to the structures and processes that ensure this data integrity.
Important Skills Needed:
How to Put It Into Action:
A thorough technology assessment is the first step in building a credible ESG data framework. This means comparing an organization’s current systems to changing regulatory requirements. This first analysis helps choose and set up an integrated ESG data management solution that will bring all the ESG information together.
After that, strict data quality controls and validation procedures are put in place to make sure that the data on this new platform is accurate and that ESG scores remain defensible. External assurance planning, which means getting third-party verification for all important ESG metrics, makes this internal discipline even stronger. The end goal of this structured approach is to be able to make ESG disclosures that are both clear and defensible for investors, supporting sound corporate governance across the organization.
Some people might call it “ESG leadership excellence,” but the path to get there will need to go through a carefully planned three-phase transformation that lasts three years. Each phase moves the organization forward by building on the work that has already been done. Companies that want to go on this journey need to realize that success depends on whether creating what consultants call a “integrated evolution” of capabilities, governance structures, and cultural mindsets really solves the ESG issues that climate change brings. This roadmap addresses the governance factors and ESG risks that shape corporate sustainability outcomes.
| Phase and Timeline | Key Elements To Implement |
| Phase 1: Foundation Building (Months 1-6) | Conduct comprehensive competency gap assessmentEstablish ESG leadership governance structureBegin director development programsInitiate supplier ESG data collection |
| Phase 2: System Development (Months 7-18) | Implement ESG data management platformsLaunch supplier engagement programsComplete Scope 3 emissions mappingDevelop climate transition plans |
| Phase 3: Excellence Achievement (Month 19 – 36) | Achieve third-party ESG assuranceComplete board competency transformationEstablish supply chain transparencyDemonstrate competitive ESG advantage |
To change ESG leadership skills, you need a complex technology infrastructure that goes beyond traditional business systems to make an integrated ecosystem that can collect, analyze, and report sustainability data with the accuracy and dependability that modern stakeholders expect. These key components of the technology stack must align with the organization’s broader ESG considerations.
Organizations need to understand that integrating technology is much more than just buying software. It means completely rethinking how environmental, social, and governance data moves through systems to help people make decisions at all levels, reducing economic impacts from inefficiencies and strengthening corporate sustainability efforts.
Artificial Intelligence is the basic technology that helps businesses deal with the complexity and size of today’s ESG issues by using predictive risk modeling to predict environmental and social disruptions before they affect business. These AI-powered systems turn huge amounts of data from internal operations, supply chain partners, and outside sources into useful ESG analytics that helps with strategic planning and making changes to operations.
Blockchain infrastructure solves the trust and transparency problems that have long plagued claims of sustainability by making unchangeable records of supply chain activities, carbon credit transactions, and ESG performance data that stakeholders can check on their own. This technology is especially useful for tracking the flow of goods through complex global value networks, where consumers, investors, and regulators want proof of sustainability claims and verifiable environmental impacts.
Sensors that are part of the Internet of Things and advanced data analytics give you real-time information about how well the environment is doing. This lets you manage resource use, waste creation, and energy efficiency in a proactive way. These connected systems change how we manage sustainability from reporting on it every so often to constantly improving it, which is good for the environment and the bottom line.
The effectiveness of this competency framework is influenced by a dynamic external environment, necessitating considerable adaptation to the specific context of an organization. There are big differences in ESG materiality and regulatory requirements between industries and geographic areas, which makes implementation very difficult. Because of this, organizations must deal with different ESG standards and stakeholder expectations. They must also tailor their approach to meet the needs of each sector while dealing with the ongoing fragmentation of regulations between regions.
An organization’s internal maturity and limited resources have a big impact on how easy it is to implement something, in addition to outside pressures. Companies that do not have a lot of experience with ESG or money should take a practical and phased approach, which might mean pushing back deadlines or focusing on the most important leadership competencies first. This means that before committing to a full transformation, you need to realistically evaluate your current skills and resources. This will make sure that your strategic goals are both ambitious and possible.
In the end, the framework needs to be constantly changed to meet the changing needs of stakeholders. As investors, customers, and employees have higher expectations for ESG performance, companies need to stay on top of these changes without just reacting to them. Long-term success depends on being able to change strategies and regularly updating competency frameworks to keep up with new standards and market conditions. This is important in a field that is changing quickly.
The ESG transition is the biggest change in business since the digital revolution. In the new sustainable economy, companies that actively work on the three key leadership competencies (Climate Governance, Supply Chain Mastery, and Data Fluency) will come out on top.
The time to get ahead of the competition is running out quickly. Companies need to act right away to improve their ESG leadership skills before regulatory deadlines pass and talent shortages get worse. Those who wait risk being left behind in a market that is rewarding companies that do well with ESG and punishing those that don’t.
The way forward is clear: invest in developing ESG leaders today so you can stay ahead of the competition tomorrow.